lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] pid_ns: move pid_ns_release_proc() from proc_flush_task() to zap_pid_ns_processes()
Oleg Nesterov [oleg@redhat.com] wrote:
| This is mostly cleanup and optimization, but also fixes the bug.
|
| proc_flush_task() checks upid->nr == 1 to detect the case when
| a sub-namespace exits. However, this doesn't work in case when
| a multithreaded init execs and calls release_task(old_leader),
| the old leader has the same pid 1.
|
| Move pid_ns_release_proc() to zap_pid_ns_processes(), it is called
| when we know for sure that init is exiting.

Hmm, I almost agreed, but have a question :-)

Yes, we know that the container-init is exiting. But if its parent (in
the parent ns) waits on it and calls release_task(), won't we call
proc_flush_task_mnt() on this container-init ? This would happen after
dropping the mnt in zap_pid_ns_processes() no ?

At the time zap_pid_ns_processes() is called, the container-init is still
not in EXIT_ZOMBIE state right ? (Or does your statement below include
EXIT_DEAD and EXIT_ZOMBIE tasks ?)

|
| Note: with or without this change this mntput() can happen before the
| EXIT_DEAD tasks not visible to do_wait() have passed proc_flush_task().
| We need more fixes.
|

Sukadev


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-24 08:27    [W:2.027 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site