lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/9] PM / Hibernate: user, implement user_ops writer
Date
On Wednesday, June 02, 2010, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Switch /dev/snapshot writer to hibernate_io_ops approach so that we
> can do whatever we want with snapshot processing code. All the later
> code changes will be transparent and needn't care about different
> readers/writers.

Well. I don't want image data to undergo _any_ transformations within the
kernel before going to s2disk. In fact, s2disk is supposed to do whatever it
wants with the image data (that are supposed to be _raw_ image data).

So, I don't think we need to "switch" /dev/snapshot to anything adding
complexity in the process.

> In this patch only writer is implemented -- for better bisectability
> if something breaks. (The development was easier too, because one
> could break only one part, not both.)
>
> Also, when using this interface, switch to the ops on open/release,
> so they are used.
>
> There are explicit barriers protecting to_do_buffer, because it is
> all done in a producer-consumer fashion:
> PRODUCER (snapshot layer)
> 1) to_do_buffer is set
> 2) set TODO bit
> 3) wake CONSUMER
> 4) wait for TODO bit _clear_
>
> CONSUMER (fops->read)
> 1) wait for TODO bit
> 2) pass to_do_buffer to userspace
> 3) clear TODO bit
> 4) wake PRODUCER
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> ---
> kernel/power/user.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/user.c b/kernel/power/user.c
> index e819e17..b4610c3 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/user.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/user.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
> #include <linux/console.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/freezer.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
> #include <scsi/scsi_scan.h>
>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> @@ -61,10 +63,93 @@ static struct snapshot_data {
> char frozen;
> char ready;
> char platform_support;
> + struct hibernate_io_ops *prev_ops;
> } snapshot_state;
>
> atomic_t snapshot_device_available = ATOMIC_INIT(1);
>
> +static struct {
> + void *buffer; /* buffer to pass through */
> + struct workqueue_struct *worker; /* the thread initiating read/write */
> + wait_queue_head_t wait; /* wait for buffer */
> + wait_queue_head_t done; /* read/write done? */
> + struct mutex lock; /* protection for buffer */
> +
> +#define TODO_WORK 1
> +#define TODO_FINISH 2
> +#define TODO_CLOSED 3
> +#define TODO_ERROR 4
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(flags, 10); /* TODO_* flags defined above */
> +} to_do;
> +
> +static unsigned long user_free_space(void)
> +{
> + return ~0UL; /* we have no idea, maybe we will fail later */
> +}
> +
> +static struct hibernate_io_handle *user_writer_start(void)
> +{
> + return hib_io_handle_alloc(0) ? : ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +}
> +
> +static int user_write_page(struct hibernate_io_handle *io_handle, void *buf,
> + struct bio **bio_chain)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + if (test_bit(TODO_CLOSED, to_do.flags))
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&to_do.lock);
> + to_do.buffer = buf;
> + mutex_unlock(&to_do.lock);
> + set_bit(TODO_WORK, to_do.flags);
> + wake_up_interruptible(&to_do.wait);
> +
> + wait_event(to_do.done, !test_bit(TODO_WORK, to_do.flags) ||
> + (err = test_bit(TODO_CLOSED, to_do.flags)));
> +
> + return err ? -EIO : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int user_writer_finish(struct hibernate_io_handle *io_handle,
> + unsigned int flags, int error)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + if (error)
> + set_bit(TODO_ERROR, to_do.flags);
> + set_bit(TODO_FINISH, to_do.flags);
> + wake_up_interruptible(&to_do.wait);
> +
> + wait_event(to_do.done, !test_bit(TODO_FINISH, to_do.flags) ||
> + (err = test_bit(TODO_CLOSED, to_do.flags)));
> +
> + if (!error && err)
> + error = -EIO;
> +
> + return error;
> +}
> +
> +struct hibernate_io_ops user_ops = {
> + .free_space = user_free_space,
> +
> + .writer_start = user_writer_start,
> + .writer_finish = user_writer_finish,
> + .write_page = user_write_page,
> +};
> +
> +static void snapshot_writer(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = swsusp_write(0);
> + if (ret)
> + printk(KERN_ERR "PM: write failed with %d\n", ret);
> +}
> +
> +static DECLARE_WORK(snapshot_writer_w, snapshot_writer);
> +
> static int snapshot_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> {
> struct snapshot_data *data;
> @@ -115,9 +200,17 @@ static int snapshot_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> }
> if (error)
> atomic_inc(&snapshot_device_available);
> + else {
> + data->prev_ops = hibernate_io_ops;
> + hibernate_io_ops = &user_ops;
> + }
> data->frozen = 0;
> data->ready = 0;
> data->platform_support = 0;
> + memset(to_do.flags, 0, sizeof(*to_do.flags));
> + init_waitqueue_head(&to_do.wait);
> + init_waitqueue_head(&to_do.done);
> + mutex_init(&to_do.lock);
>
> Unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
> @@ -131,6 +224,10 @@ static int snapshot_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>
> mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
>
> + set_bit(TODO_CLOSED, to_do.flags);
> + wake_up(&to_do.done);
> + flush_workqueue(to_do.worker);
> +
> swsusp_free();
> free_basic_memory_bitmaps();
> data = filp->private_data;
> @@ -139,6 +236,7 @@ static int snapshot_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> thaw_processes();
> pm_notifier_call_chain(data->mode == O_WRONLY ?
> PM_POST_HIBERNATION : PM_POST_RESTORE);
> + hibernate_io_ops = data->prev_ops;
> atomic_inc(&snapshot_device_available);
>
> mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
> @@ -152,6 +250,7 @@ static ssize_t snapshot_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf,
> struct snapshot_data *data;
> ssize_t res;
> loff_t pg_offp = *offp & ~PAGE_MASK;
> + int fin = 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
>
> @@ -161,18 +260,31 @@ static ssize_t snapshot_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf,
> goto Unlock;
> }
> if (!pg_offp) { /* on page boundary? */
> - res = snapshot_read_next(&data->handle);

I really don't understand why you're willing to do this. In the s2disk case we
have an image in memory and we only want to trasfer it to user space
page-by-page, where user space decides when each page is going to be
transferred. snapshot_read_next() is for that and while you can modify it
however you like, I don't think it's really worth it.

> - if (res <= 0)
> + res = wait_event_interruptible(to_do.wait,
> + test_bit(TODO_WORK, to_do.flags) ||
> + (fin = test_and_clear_bit(TODO_FINISH, to_do.flags)));
> + if (res)
> goto Unlock;
> - } else {
> - res = PAGE_SIZE - pg_offp;
> + if (test_bit(TODO_ERROR, to_do.flags)) {
> + res = -EIO;
> + goto Unlock;
> + }
> + if (fin)
> + goto wake;
> }
> + res = PAGE_SIZE - pg_offp;
>
> - res = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, &pg_offp,
> - data_of(data->handle), res);
> + mutex_lock(&to_do.lock);
> + res = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, &pg_offp, to_do.buffer, res);
> + mutex_unlock(&to_do.lock);
> if (res > 0)
> *offp += res;
>
> + if (!(pg_offp & ~PAGE_MASK)) {
> + clear_bit(TODO_WORK, to_do.flags);
> +wake:
> + wake_up(&to_do.done);
> + }
> Unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
>
> @@ -278,8 +390,11 @@ static long snapshot_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
> error = hibernation_snapshot(data->platform_support);
> if (!error)
> error = put_user(in_suspend, (int __user *)arg);
> - if (!error)
> + if (!error) {
> + if (in_suspend)
> + queue_work(to_do.worker, &snapshot_writer_w);
> data->ready = 1;
> + }
> break;
>
> case SNAPSHOT_ATOMIC_RESTORE:
> @@ -473,7 +588,16 @@ static struct miscdevice snapshot_device = {
>
> static int __init snapshot_device_init(void)
> {
> - return misc_register(&snapshot_device);
> + int ret;
> +
> + to_do.worker = create_singlethread_workqueue("suspend_worker");
> + if (!to_do.worker)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = misc_register(&snapshot_device);
> + if (ret)
> + destroy_workqueue(to_do.worker);
> + return ret;
> };
>
> device_initcall(snapshot_device_init);

And using a special workqueue for this purpose is seriously over the top IMnshO.

Why don't you just regard s2disk as a special case and don't touch it
(or modify it only so much to prevent it from getting in the way)?

Rafael


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-24 18:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans