Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 2 Jun 2010 10:42:02 +0200 | Subject | Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2010-05-28 | From | Sedat Dilek <> |
| |
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:22 PM, reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Sedat, > > On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 06:34 -0700, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Two people confirmed the patch in [2] fixes: >> 1. iwlwifi-2.6 GIT master (commit f10a237c95abd6d64a3a24553bd1d3bcddd9108b) >> 2. compat-wireless (2010-05-21) >> >> And it fixes also the above mentionned combination. > > We are working on getting this patch upstream. The version tested > contains a significant amount of duplicated code as well as some cleanup > code mixed in. It is thus not appropriate for an upstream submission at > this time. >
What do you mean by "upstream"? upstream for me is Linus-tree (linux-2.6 GIT master). Patches against iwlwifi-2.6 GIT trees are not very helpful in my case.
>> As a suggestion: >> What about "copying" bug-reports (incl. its history) from IWL-BTS into >> linux-wireless ML? >> For example (dri-devel related) bug-reports from >> bugzilla.freedesktop.org are "copied" into dri-devel ML. > > Pointing people to the bug report seems to work ok. What benefit does > the above have? >
[+] People - not subscribed to the BR - can follow "on change". [-] Blow up linux-wireless ML?
- Sedat -
| |