Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:13:42 -0700 | From | Doug Doan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: call mmu notifiers on hugepage cow |
| |
On 06/01/2010 11:16 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2010 13:43:00 -0700 Doug Doan<dougd@cray.com> wrote: > >> >> When a copy-on-write occurs, we take one of two paths in handle_mm_fault: >> through handle_pte_fault for normal pages, or through hugetlb_fault for huge pages. >> >> In the normal page case, we eventually get to do_wp_page and call mmu notifiers >> via ptep_clear_flush_notify. There is no callout to the mmmu notifiers in the >> huge page case. This patch fixes that. >> >> Signed-off-by: Doug Doan<dougd@cray.com> >> --- >> >> [patch text/plain (802B)] >> --- mm/hugetlb.c.orig 2010-05-27 13:07:58.569546314 -0700 >> +++ mm/hugetlb.c 2010-05-26 14:41:06.449296524 -0700 > > (In patch -p1 form, please. So a/mm/hugetlb.c) > >> @@ -2345,11 +2345,17 @@ retry_avoidcopy: >> ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, address& huge_page_mask(h)); >> if (likely(pte_same(huge_ptep_get(ptep), pte))) { >> /* Break COW */ >> + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, >> + address& huge_page_mask(h), >> + (address& huge_page_mask(h)) + huge_page_size(h)); >> huge_ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, ptep); >> set_huge_pte_at(mm, address, ptep, >> make_huge_pte(vma, new_page, 1)); >> /* Make the old page be freed below */ >> new_page = old_page; >> + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, >> + address& huge_page_mask(h), >> + (address& huge_page_mask(h)) + huge_page_size(h)); >> } >> page_cache_release(new_page); >> page_cache_release(old_page); > > This causes mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start() to be called under > page_table_lock. The immediately preceding code seems to take some > care to avoid doing that. I took a quick look at other callsites and > cannot immediately see other cases where > mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start/end() are called under that lock. > > This may not introduce bugs with current notifier implementations (I > didn't check), but it does lessen flexibility?
In the normal page case, handle_pte_fault calls do_wp_page inside a spinlock on ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd), which uses mm->page_table_lock if USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS is not defined.
I don't understand what you mean by lessen flexibilty.
| |