Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:17:27 +0200 | Subject | Re: [RESEND][REGRESSION] um: CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y broken | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 17:22, richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 15:49, richard -rw- weinberger >> <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Andrew, Linus, Jeff, ... anyone? >>> Please apply this patch. >>> >>> CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is still broken. :( >> >> I wanted to verify Tim's patch, but after enabling CONFIG_STATIC_LINK, >> it fails to link >> (with or without your patch): >> > > BTW: Does CONFIG_STATIC_LINK work for you when you revert commit > 5d150a97f9391f5bcd7ba0d59d7a11c3de3cea80 (um: Clean up linker script > using standard macros)?
Still the same linking errors ;-(
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |