lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: perf_disable()
From
Date
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 23:04 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:29:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > There is a fun little recursion issue with perf_adjust_period(), where
> > if we fully removed perf_disable() we could end up calling pmu::stop()
> > twice and such.
>
>
>
> We can have a local_t made nesting level on the stop/start that could easily
> deal with this.

Fanning it out to the relevant pmu implementation is the interesting
part..




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-11 23:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans