lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] perf events finer grained context instrumentation / context exclusion
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:26:18AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Here is the new version of per context exclusion, based on hooks on
> > irq_enter/irq_exit. I haven't observed slowdowns but I haven't actually
> > measured the impact.
>
> One thing that would be nice to see in this discussion is a comparison of
> before/after perf stat --repeat runs.
>
> Something like:
>
> perf stat --repeat ./hackbench 5
>
> Done with full stat, and then also done with hardirqs/softirqs excluded. (i.e.
> task context stats only)



Right, so I just tried each perf stat default events with :t and it hung up ;-)

(Not severely, I can kill perf stat with ^Z, but still there is something I need
to fix).



>
> I.e. does the feature really give us the expected statistical stability in
> results? Does it really exclude hardirq/softirq workloads, etc.?


But yeah, before posting these patches I gave that a try with the instruction
counter and it didn't change much against the usual results, it's about the same
variations.

I just know the exclusion works by using perf record -g / perf report, as the
callchains are truly reliable against the exclusion rules, and since
counting and samples are treated the same in this scheme (we just deactivate
/reactivate, there is no post blocking or fixup).

I just don't know where the entropy comes from. May be once I'll have the hang
fixed I'll be able to test with all the default stat events and see a better
overview of progress.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-10 09:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans