Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:00:39 +0300 | Subject | Re: Article in Phoronix about loss of performance in 2.6.35 release candidates | From | Pekka Enberg <> |
| |
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:10 AM, <tytso@mit.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:19:29AM +0100, Alex Buell wrote: >> http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=14976 >> >> Question: Why? > > One of the theories that has been advanced is that it's simply this > problem: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/22/154 > > If so, it points out how idiotic Phoronix is about not being able to > notice udev pegging the CPU at 100% being someone bad for its > benchmark runs. :-) > > OTOH, this bug has been known for over a week, and it is sort sad that > we haven't reverted this patch. It looks like the conversation has > died, but without a fix?
It's fixed by 1eb2cbb6d5efe129 so the problem doesn't exist for 2.6.35-r1. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |