Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 May 2010 13:32:15 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for May 6 (acpi: PM=n) |
| |
On Thu, 06 May 2010 16:26:13 -0400 (EDT) Len Brown wrote:
> > When CONFIG_PM is not set: > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `acpi_init': > > bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d84): undefined reference to `pm_flags' > > bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d91): undefined reference to `pm_flags' > > CONFIG_ACPI depends on CONFIG_PM, > so acpi/bus.c should not be compiled for CONFIG_PM=n > > Hmm, is is somebody doing something strange, like "select ACPI" > without guaranteeing that all of ACPI's dependencies are satisfied?
Oh, thanks for the clue.
That would be a patch that I commented on and was ignored, but James Morris merged it anyway. Now it should be dropped.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/4/379
--- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
| |