lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6)
Date
On Thursday 06 May 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 5 May 2010, Brian Swetland wrote:
>
> > > Probably generalizing these into the LDM is the direction to go so
> > > userspace can set constraints on a per-device (or per-class?) basis:
> > >
> > > /sys/devices/.../power/constraint/throughput
> > > /sys/devices/.../power/constraint/wakeup_latency
> > > /sys/devices/.../power/constraint/... ?
> >
> > The constraint stuff is definitely something I'd love to talk about in
> > detail. It's a problem that I think is common to every SoC I've
> > worked with. Having a general solution for this problem (of
> > specifying and observing various constraints for clock, power, qos,
> > etc) kernel-wide would seem like a big win.
> >
> > Might be worth kicking some design ideas around and getting a bunch of
> > the interested parties together at some of the upcoming linux
> > conference things this fall on the east coast?
>
> The Linux Power-Management Summit is scheduled for August 9, at the
> start of the LinuxCon meeting in Boston. This would make an excellent
> topic for discussion.

Agreed.

Rafael


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-06 21:27    [W:0.182 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site