lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCHSET] sched,perf: unify tracers in sched and move perf on top of TP
From
Date
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 11:32 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > Well, I already utterly hate that x86 can't build with !
> > CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS, also requiring CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS is going the wrong
> > way.
> >
> > I've always explicitly avoided depending on tracepoints, and I'd very
> > much like to keep it that way.
>
> I was wondering the other way around - ie. the possibility to make
> perf optional and maybe even as a module which depends on TPs, which
> would be nicer than the current situation and make the code less
> cluttered too.

I really really hate making perf rely on tracepoints.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-05 11:53    [W:0.157 / U:0.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site