Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 May 2010 20:11:45 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf stat: add perf stat -B to pretty print large numbers |
| |
Em Mon, May 31, 2010 at 04:49:02PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu escreveu: > the same places, -B or not -B. I was sort of expecting that the first > example wouldn't have commas in it, or something? Or were those two
Right, from a quick read it seems you saw a bug in the changeset and I saw none in the patch itself.
I've read the intent, tested the patches, found it matched the intent, happily applied the patch with a confusing/wrong comment, too bad :-\
> examples *supposed* to be identical, and there's a not-shown 3rd example > that shows what you get if you use -B and set the LC_NUMERIC variable?
- Arnaldo
| |