[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
    On Mon, 31 May 2010 22:12:19 +0200
    Florian Mickler <> wrote:

    > On Sat, 29 May 2010 20:12:14 +0200
    > Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:
    > >
    > > Why would you try to let buggy apps work as intended instead of break
    > > them as hard as possible? Such policy promotes crappy code since people
    > > get away with it.
    > If I have a simple shell script then I don't wanna jump through
    > hoops just to please your fragile kernel.

    Also why should that code on one device kill my uptime and on the
    other machine (my wall-plugged desktop) work just well? That doesn't
    sound right.

    Clearly opportunistic suspend is a workaround for battery-driven devices
    and no general solution. But it is not specific to android. At least
    not inherently. It could be useful for any embedded or mobile device
    where you can clearly distinguish important functions from convenience

    I really can't understand the whole _fundamental_ opposition to this
    design choice.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-31 22:51    [W:0.020 / U:72.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site