lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:01:50AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> writes:
> > Well, shallow could mean that the state lacks the CPUIDLE_FLAG_DEEP
> > flag; that should be relatively portable. In any case, it seems
> > more so than "if I put in a 55us latency requirement, I'll stay out
> > of C3".
>
> I guess it depends on your goal. Do you just want to stay out of C3
> on your current platform? or do you want to stay out of any low-power
> state (on any platform) where you'll have a latency of > 55 usecs?

I'd say that one plausible requirement is "DMA works", with another
being "all interrupts work" as distinguished from "wakeup interrupts
work".

--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-03 23:41    [W:0.400 / U:0.704 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site