lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Sat, 29 May 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Correct, I strongly oppose using suspend. Not running runnable tasks is
> not a sane solution.
>
> If current hardware can't cope, too friggin bad, get better hardware.

Taken out of context, this statement suggests you believe that
x86-based laptops should not be allowed to suspend automatically when
their lids are closed, and that everybody should replace their
x86-based laptops with something better.

Is that really what you mean?

Alan Stern



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-29 16:19    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans