lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
    On Sat, 29 May 2010 02:42:35 +0300
    Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:

    > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@nokia.com> wrote:
    > > ext Brian Swetland wrote:
    > >> How is it flawed?  Serious question.
    > >
    > > I would avoid repeating all the good arguments given so far, but to make it
    > > short:
    > >
    > > * I believe runtime PM is a much better starting point (at least for the
    > > type of HW targeted at mobile devices) because it mimics an always-on system
    > > toward userspace, which requires less disruption in the way apps are
    > > designed
    >
    > I agree.
    >
    > If I understand correctly, if we have a perfect user-space that only
    > does work when strictly needed and trying to do it in bursts, then we
    > would be reaching the lowest power state, and there would be no need
    > for suspend. The problem is that Android's user-space is pretty far
    > from that, so they said "let's segregate user-space and go to lower
    > power mode anyway".

    This has already been mentioned (who knew?): Android doesn't
    want to depend on userspace for this.

    Cheers,
    Flo
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-29 10:31    [W:0.020 / U:92.836 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site