Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 May 2010 16:22:23 +0200 | From | Piotr Hosowicz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: Provide local_clock() and improve documentation |
| |
On 28.05.2010 16:15, Piotr Hosowicz wrote: > On 28.05.2010 15:13, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 11:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> >>> Cool, thanks. You didn't Cc a mailing list :( >> >> Oops, must have managed to wreck the CC list somewhere, restored LKML. >> >> How does the below look? > > Earlier someone (you? I didn't write down) has published such a patch:
(cut patch)
> Should I apply it first and then your today's patch or only the today's > patch?
Sorry, no question, today's patch must have been incorporated in the git repo, I see it fails to apply again. And the earlier one also.
But what about commit f4b87dee9 - should I revert it before build?
Regards and sorry for the noise.
Piotr Hosowicz
-- - No wiesz, pijany i o trzeciej nad ranem wracasz do domu!? - A kto powiedział, że wracam? Po gitarę tylko przyszedłem. NP: Mark Knopfler - Before Gas & TV NB: 2.6.34-20100527-2020-gitt-revtd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |