lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
Date
On Thursday 27 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:05:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer we avoided mixing them up. Everyone seems fairly happy with
> > the current operator ordered suspend behaviour I believe ?
>
> No. The current mechanism can lose wakeup events.

As long as the operator agrees to lose wakeup events occasionally, which is
the case at least 99% of the time, there's nothing wrong with that IMO.

Rafael


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-28 00:47    [W:0.361 / U:5.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site