Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) | Date | Fri, 28 May 2010 00:45:32 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday 27 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:05:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > I'd prefer we avoided mixing them up. Everyone seems fairly happy with > > the current operator ordered suspend behaviour I believe ? > > No. The current mechanism can lose wakeup events.
As long as the operator agrees to lose wakeup events occasionally, which is the case at least 99% of the time, there's nothing wrong with that IMO.
Rafael
| |