lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
    On Thu, 27 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:

    > > > Doesn't help - I may be hit by the signal between the poll() unblocking
    > > > and me having the opportunity to call sigmask().
    > >
    > > ppoll(). This is all existing solved stuff.
    >
    > Isn't that the inverse of what we want? The application should default
    > to being SIGSTOPpable except in the case of it being in the process of
    > having a specific event delivered.

    Would it help to divide the application into two processes, one of
    which receives events and the other does the drawing?

    Alan Stern



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-27 23:27    [W:6.452 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site