[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Controlling Driver Load Order
Robert Emanuele wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
> I am using the i2c-gpio.c driver, not the i2c-at91 driver. The Atmel
> folks have expressed concerns over their i2c silicon and wrote a gpio
> version.
> Anyway, I better understand the subsys_initcall now and applied that
> to the i2c-gpio and my i2c chip driver. That worked perfectly for my
> issue. I'd be happy to return a patch of this. Would be this the
> sort of thing that would benefit from a config option? Something
> like:
> #if defined(CONFIG_EARLY_i2C_GPIO)
> subsys_initcall(i2c_gpio_init);
> #else
> module_init(i2c_gpio_init);
> #endif

Looks like this has already been done:

There was a discussion a while back to make all of the embedded i2c
busses be subsys_initcall since i2c is often a system bus on embedded
devices. Looks the i2c_gpio driver got missed the first time round.


Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre

Ryan Mallon 5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013 New Zealand
Phone: +64 3 3779127 Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
Fax: +64 3 3779135 USA 1800 261 2934

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-27 23:11    [W:0.096 / U:1.216 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site