Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) | From | Kevin Hilman <> | Date | Thu, 27 May 2010 11:44:13 -0700 |
| |
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> writes:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:05:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > >> I'd prefer we avoided mixing them up. Everyone seems fairly happy with >> the current operator ordered suspend behaviour I believe ? > > No. The current mechanism can lose wakeup events.
And the proposed solution (suspend blockers) does nothing to solve the loss of wakeup events during forced suspend.
Kevin
| |