Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 May 2010 19:20:58 +0100 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) |
| |
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:17:16PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Actually, the reverse - there's no terribly good way to make PCs work > > with scheduler-based suspend, but there's no reason why they wouldn't > > work with the current opportunistic suspend implementation. > > If one works so does the other.
Not at all. The entire point of opportunistic suspend is that I don't care is currently in TASK_RUNNABLE or has a timer that's due to expire in 100msec - based on policy (through not having any held suspend blockers), I'll go to sleep. That's easily possible on PCs.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |