Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 May 2010 13:41:34 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alan Stern <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) |
| |
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Does this mean you believe "echo mem >/sys/power/state" is bad and > > should be removed? Or "echo disk >/sys/power/state"? They pay no > > mem should be replaced by an idle suspend to ram mechanism
In other words, you are suggesting that not only should the Android patches not be accepted, in addition a large part of the PM suspend framework should be rewritten?
Alan Stern
| |