[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> Crap. Stop beating on those lost wakeup events. If we lose them then
> the drivers are broken and do not handle the switch over correctly. Or
> the suspend mechanism is broken as it does not evaluate the system
> state correctly. Blockers are just papering over that w/o tackling the
> real problem.

That's the point -- suspend does not evaluate the system state
correctly because it doesn't have the necessary information. Suspend
blockers are a way of providing it that information. They don't paper
over the problem; they solve it.

Alan Stern

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-27 19:39    [W:0.385 / U:5.192 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site