lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] workqueue: Add an API to create a singlethread workqueue attached to the current task's cgroup
On 05/27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:04:51PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> > Add a new kernel API to create a singlethread workqueue and attach it's
> > task to current task's cgroup and cpumask.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>
>
> Could someone familiar with workqueue code please comment on whether
> this patch is suitable for 2.6.35?
>
> It is needed to fix the case where vhost user might cause a kernel
> thread to consume more CPU than allowed by the cgroup.
> Should I merge it through the vhost tree?
> Ack for this?

I don't understand the reasons for this patch, but this doesn't matter.

I don't really see any need to change workqueue.c,

> > +static struct task_struct *get_singlethread_wq_task(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
> > +{
> > + return (per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, singlethread_cpu))->thread;
> > +}

(Not sure this trivial static helper with the single caller makes sense, but
see below)

> > +/* Create a singlethread workqueue and attach it's task to the current task's
> > + * cgroup and set it's cpumask to the current task's cpumask.
> > + */
> > +struct workqueue_struct *create_singlethread_workqueue_in_current_cg(char *name)
> > +{
> > + struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> > + struct task_struct *task;
> > + cpumask_var_t mask;
> > +
> > + wq = create_singlethread_workqueue(name);
> > + if (!wq)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > + if (sched_getaffinity(current->pid, mask))
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > + task = get_singlethread_wq_task(wq);
> > + if (sched_setaffinity(task->pid, mask))
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > + if (cgroup_attach_task_current_cg(task))
> > + goto err;
> > +out:
> > + return wq;
> > +err:
> > + destroy_workqueue(wq);
> > + wq = NULL;
> > + goto out;
> > +}

Instead, cgroup.c (or whoever needs this) can do

struct move_struct {
struct work_struct work;
int ret;
};

static void move_func(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct move_struct *move = container_of(...);

if (cgroup_attach_task_current_cg(current))
ret = -EANY;
}

static struct workqueue_struct *create_singlethread_workqueue_in_current_cg(char *name)
{
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
struct move_struct move = {
.work = __WORK_INITIALIZER(move_func);
};

wq = create_singlethread_workqueue(name);
if (!wq)
return NULL;

queue_work(&move.work);
flush_work(&move.work);

if (move.ret) {
destroy_workqueue(wq);
wq = NULL;
}

return wq;
}

Or. Just export wq_per_cpu() from workqueue.c (probably with a better name) and
use it like the patch does.

But, imho, create_singlethread_workqueue_in_current_cg() does not belong
to workqueue.c.

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-27 14:49    [W:2.059 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site