[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/8] PM: suspend_block: Add driver to access suspend blockers from user-space
On Thursday 27 May 2010, Alan Cox wrote:
> > This whole thing is related to the statistics part, which Arve says is
> > essential to him. He wants to collect statistics for each suspend blocker
> > activated and deactivated so that he can tell who's causing problems by
> > blocking suspend too often. The name also is a part of this.
> If he wants to collect stats about misbehaving code then presumably he
> needs reliable stats. Arbitary user set names are not reliable and
> judging by app vendor behaviour in the proprietary space with other such
> examples they will actively name their blockers in a manner specifically
> intended to hide the cause so as to 'reduce support costs'.
> Its a waste of memory (especially if I create a million of them with a
> long name for fun).

Well, I won't argue with that. :-)

> It's all an economic system, proprietary app vendors are in it to make
> money, some will therefore game the system and the rest will be forced to
> follow to keep their playing field fair.

Good point.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-27 00:47    [W:0.340 / U:4.844 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site