lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: build warning in Linus'tree


On Wed, 26 May 2010, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> If my suggestion above works, then one could start transforming current uses of __BYTE_ORDER,
> into similar constructs and once all are done, #define both __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN and
> move back to #if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN

No. Don't do it. Why the hell would we want to use the inferior model?

Linus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-26 17:35    [W:1.697 / U:0.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site