Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 May 2010 08:29:02 -0700 (PDT) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build warning in Linus'tree |
| |
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > If my suggestion above works, then one could start transforming current uses of __BYTE_ORDER, > into similar constructs and once all are done, #define both __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN and > move back to #if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
No. Don't do it. Why the hell would we want to use the inferior model?
Linus
| |