lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
    On Wed, 26 May 2010 14:19:42 +0100
    Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:


    > > This is a _big_ plus for attracting 3rd party programs. (And of course
    > > the thing you don't like).
    >
    > You would do better to concentrate on technical issues that the
    > assignment of malicious intent to other parties.
    >
    > Alan

    This was nothing the kind of! He explicitly said this:

    On Wed, 26 May 2010 15:29:32 +0300
    Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com> wrote:

    > What I find ridiculous is the assumption that kernel should provide good
    > power management even for badly written applications. They should work,
    > of course, but there's no assumption that the kernel should cope with
    > those applications and provide good battery usage on those cases.

    And I responded that if the kernel would do this, then that would
    be a "_big_ plus for attracting 3d party programs".

    I had no intent in attacking anyone or putting word's in someones mouth.
    Sorry if this was unclearly written.

    Cheers,
    Flo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-26 15:43    [W:4.668 / U:0.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site