lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Wed, 26 May 2010 14:01:49 +0200
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org> wrote:
>
> > This is not "protection". This is functioning properly in a real world
> > scenario. Why would the user change the kernel, if the device would be
> > buggy after that? (Except maybe he is a geek)
>
> Hmm... Why would the user continue to use the program if it slows down
> his device and sucks the battery as a vampire (Except maybe he's a
> moron)? ;)
>
> ~Vitaly

Because he is using a robust kernel that provides suspend blockers and
is preventing the vampire from sucking power?

Most users don't even grasp the simple concept of different "programs".
They just have a device and click here and there and are happy.

Really, what are you getting at? Do you deny that there are programs,
that prevent a device from sleeping? (Just think of the bouncing
cows app)

And if you have two kernels, one with which your device is dead after 1
hour and one with which your device is dead after 10 hours. Which would
you prefer? I mean really... this is ridiculous.

Cheers,
Flo



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-26 14:27    [W:3.589 / U:0.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site