lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 02:41 -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
    > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
    > > On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 01:38 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > >> > This of course will lead to a scattering of suspend blockers into any
    > >> > drivers/subsystems considered "useful", which by looking through current
    > >> > Android kernels is many of them.
    > >>
    > >> That depends on the maintainers of these subsystems, who still have the power
    > >> to reject requested changes.
    > >
    > > So as a scheduler maintainer I'm going to merge a patch that does a
    > > suspend_blocker when the runqueue's aren't empty... how about that?
    > >
    >
    > I don't know if you are serious, since the all the runqueues are never
    > empty while suspending, this would disable opportunistic suspend
    > altogether.

    So why again was this such a great scheme? Go fix your userspace to not
    not run when not needed.
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-26 11:47    [W:2.497 / U:0.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site