[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Patch 1/1] x86 efi: Fill all reserved memmap entries if add_efi_memmap specified.
    On 05/25/2010 03:34 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
    > H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    >> On 05/13/2010 02:55 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
    >>> I saw that too, and wondered why e820_saved did not
    >>> have the extra entries. The comment indicates it
    >>> should.
    >>> I'm on the system tonight and will investigate this
    >>> further.
    >> e820_saved lacks the extra entries because they aren't being passed in
    >> from the bootloader, as they should, and instead you're using
    >> add_efi_memmap which is, as far as the kernel is concerned, a post-boot
    >> modification.
    >> That being said, add_efi_memmap does come from the firmware, and as such
    >> it would be legitimate for it to add them to e820_saved.
    >> -hpa
    > Did this last patch meet expectations?

    I'm concerned about calling sanitize_e820_map() on e820_saved; it is
    supposed to reflect the raw data as reported by the source, and
    sanitizing it would corrupt that.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-26 00:45    [W:0.194 / U:43.964 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site