[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Patch 1/1] x86 efi: Fill all reserved memmap entries if add_efi_memmap specified.
On 05/25/2010 03:34 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 05/13/2010 02:55 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
>>> I saw that too, and wondered why e820_saved did not
>>> have the extra entries. The comment indicates it
>>> should.
>>> I'm on the system tonight and will investigate this
>>> further.
>> e820_saved lacks the extra entries because they aren't being passed in
>> from the bootloader, as they should, and instead you're using
>> add_efi_memmap which is, as far as the kernel is concerned, a post-boot
>> modification.
>> That being said, add_efi_memmap does come from the firmware, and as such
>> it would be legitimate for it to add them to e820_saved.
>> -hpa
> Did this last patch meet expectations?

I'm concerned about calling sanitize_e820_map() on e820_saved; it is
supposed to reflect the raw data as reported by the source, and
sanitizing it would corrupt that.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-26 00:45    [W:0.062 / U:1.376 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site