[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: Cleancache [PATCH 2/7] (was Transcendent Memory): core files
> > The third one is pgoff_t; again, use sane types, _if_ you actually
> want
> > the argument #3 at all - it can be derived from struct page you are
> > passing there as well.
> I thought it best to declare the _ops so that the struct page
> is opaque to the "backend" (driver). The kernel-side ("frontend")
> defines the handle and ensures coherency, so the backend shouldn't
> be allowed to derive or muck with the three-tuple passed by the
> kernel. In the existing (Xen tmem) driver, the only operation
> performed on the struct page parameter is page_to_pfn(). OTOH,
> I could go one step further and pass a pfn_t instead of a
> struct page, since it is really only the physical page frame that
> the backend needs to know about and (synchronously) read/write from/to.
> Thoughts?

Silly me. pfn_t is a Xen/KVM type not otherwise used in the
kernel AFAICT. Please ignore...

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-25 04:19    [W:0.045 / U:19.344 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site