[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6)
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 08:57:54PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:

> And btw I do have wakelock-less implementation of autosleep, that only
> sleeped the machine when nothing was ready to run. It was called
> "sleepy linux". Should I dig it out?

As has been explained several times now, that's not equivalent. The
difference is what makes this a hard problem. If a usecase is valid and
nobody can come up with a convincing explanation of what an elegant
solution would look like, then the ugly solution wins.

Matthew Garrett |

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-24 21:11    [W:0.313 / U:3.056 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site