Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 23 May 2010 12:20:24 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq |
| |
* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hello, > > On 05/23/2010 11:13 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > ... which is then used for the concurrency-managed > > workqueue feature, which is then used for a BTRFS > > speedup, right? > > > > ( If that's not the plan then color me confused :) > > Yeap, you're officially confused. :-) It doesn't have > much to do with btrfs at this point [...]
Not exclusive to btrfs of course, but IIRC one of the examples given in one of those threads was btrfs scalability, right?
In case it's not obvious, i'm trying to find a tangible improvement to examine. No need to resend stuff, do you have a link to that old performance measurement by any chance?
Thanks,
Ingo
| |