lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq

* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On 05/23/2010 11:13 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > ... which is then used for the concurrency-managed
> > workqueue feature, which is then used for a BTRFS
> > speedup, right?
> >
> > ( If that's not the plan then color me confused :)
>
> Yeap, you're officially confused. :-) It doesn't have
> much to do with btrfs at this point [...]

Not exclusive to btrfs of course, but IIRC one of the
examples given in one of those threads was btrfs
scalability, right?

In case it's not obvious, i'm trying to find a tangible
improvement to examine. No need to resend stuff, do you
have a link to that old performance measurement by any
chance?

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-23 12:23    [W:0.127 / U:0.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site