Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 2 May 2010 22:06:15 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview |
| |
> > So what needs to be said here is 'frontswap is XX times faster than > > swap_ops based solution on workload YY'. > > Are you asking me to demonstrate that swap-to-hypervisor-RAM is > faster than swap-to-disk?
I would like comparison of swap-to-frontswap vs. swap-to-RAMdisk. Pavel
-- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
| |