lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto
From
Date
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 15:40 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> All of the CPP tests like the one used by linux/crypto.h are
> ludicrious. It should absolutely be not necessary for any code to
> duplicate this kind of calculation.
>
> Instead, this sequence should be in linux/slab.h, and be used
> universally by slab, slub, slob and anything that wants to know the
> allocators alignment guarentees.

Agreed. However, every arch should -also- set ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
appropriately so that we have documentation of the hardware requirements
on each platform.

> I don't even know of a 32-bit chip outside of x86 that doesn't
> potentially emit alignment requiring 64-bit memory operations for
> 64-bit objects. So what SLOB is doing with a different default is
> even more strange. And I bet you that even without the requirement,
> x86 runs faster with 64-bit alignment of 64-bit objects.

No doubt but SLOB explicitly trades faster for smaller.

--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-19 01:19    [W:0.131 / U:58.116 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site