[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 03:35:10AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Thanks.
> I will cook up a proper incremental patch after I get some sleep. Stephen
> it appears those two lines you have commented out are actually unnecessary.
> We have
> deactivate_super
> kill_sb aka sysfs_kill_sb
> kill_anon_super
> generic_shutdown_super
> sb_lock
> list_del(sb->s_instances)
> sb_unlock
> kfree(info)
> Nothing generic stomps on s_fs_info.
> Which means that if I find a superblock on sb->s_instances sb->s_fs_info
> still points to a valid sysfs_super_info.

Except that sb_lock is going away next cycle. There are very few users left
outside of fs/super.c and I'd much prefer it to become static.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-18 17:05    [W:0.036 / U:10.944 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site