[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 7)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <> writes:

> On Monday 17 May 2010, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:

>> How about:
>> PM: Add opportunistic suspend support.
> "PM: Opportunistic suspend support" would be sufficient IMO.
> Now, I'd start with the motivation. Like "Power management features present
> in the current mainline kernel are insufficient to get maximum possible energy
> savings on some platforms, such as Android, because ..." (here go explanations
> why this is the case in your opinion).

Yes, this will be helpful.

> Next, "To allow Android and similar platforms to save more energy than they
> currently can save using the mainline kernel, introduce a mechanism by which
> the system is automatically suspended (i.e. put into a system-wide sleep state)
> whenever it's not doing useful work, called opportunistic suspend".

Hopefully, a definition of "useful" will be given here, including by
what standards on-going work is determined not to be useful.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-18 00:19    [W:0.111 / U:13.700 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site