Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 May 2010 08:01:54 -0700 (PDT) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2]: atomic_t: Remove volatile from atomic_t definition |
| |
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > It turns out this bad code is a result of us defining atomic_t as a > volatile int.
Heh. Ok, as you point out in the commit message, I obviously agree with this patch. "volatile" on data is evil, with the possible exception of "jiffies" type things.
So applied.
Linus
| |