Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/7] perf trace: Correctly handle arrays | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Fri, 14 May 2010 12:39:46 +0200 |
| |
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 12:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > -- Steve > > > + else > > + field->elementsize = field->size; > > + > > *fields = field; > > fields = &field->next; > > > > @@ -2101,7 +2109,8 @@ static unsigned long long eval_num_arg(void *data, int size, > > } > > right = eval_num_arg(data, size, event, arg->op.right); > > val = read_size(data + larg->field.field->offset + > > - right * long_size, long_size); > > + right * larg->field.field->elementsize, > > + larg->field.field->elementsize); > > break; > > } > > default_op: > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/trace-event.h b/tools/perf/util/trace-event.h > > index 406d452..cc58a19 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/trace-event.h > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/trace-event.h > > @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ struct format_field { > > char *name; > > int offset; > > int size; > > + unsigned int arraylen; > > + unsigned int elementsize; > > unsigned long flags; > > }; > >
What's with this new fad of not trimming emails?
| |