Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 13 May 2010 01:38:14 +0400 | From | Cyrill Gorcunov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/8] [nmi watchdog] touch_softlockup cleanups and softlockup_tick removal |
| |
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:00:36PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: ... > > > > > > Ah right. > > > > > > BTW, if you address my reviews, please do it incrementally, I'm going > > > to apply this set and push it to Ingo. > > > > Ok, probably easier to review too. :-) > > > Yeah, and it's time to flush this code as it's good globally. > > Plus it would be nice to get this for .35 > > Ah and forget about the sysctl ABI breakages. Since this is only > used for kernel development, this is not going to break much things. > If somebody complains, we can still reintegrate what we had. > > Thanks. > ... Guys, could you please spend a few minutes and enlighten me a bit? Does all this series mean that we eventually will drop nmi-watchdog via io-apic (read via pic) as only the transition to perf complete?
I recall someone said about to stop using io-apic, but just to be sure.
-- Cyrill
| |