lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets
From
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think the idea is reasonable - the only way that I could see it
>> breaking someone would be code that currently does something like:
>>
>> mkdir A
>> mkdir B
>> echo 1 > A/mem_exclusive
>> echo 1 > B/mem_exclusive
>> echo $mems_for_a > A/mems
>> echo $mems_for_b > B/mems
>>
>> The attempts to set the mem_exclusive flags would fail, since A and B
>> would both have all of the parent's mems.
>>
>
> But would this not fail otherwise?
>

Assuming that mems_for_a and mems_for_b were disjoint, it would be
fine currently.

Paul


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-12 21:39    [W:0.043 / U:10.556 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site