[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Perf and ftrace [was Re: PyTimechart]
* Peter Zijlstra ( wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 18:46 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > But there is no strong reason for perf record not to use splice,
> > a part the fact that perf doesn't support splice.
> >
> Its mostly an interface/api question. You cannot easily splice() a
> mmap()'ed buffer on machines that have address constraints like sparc.

Ah ? Can you explain this issue a bit more ? There is possibly a concern I don't
quite see here.



> The thing I was thinking about is adding a new syscall that creates a
> single buffer of specified size and provides a fd. Then use
> PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_OUTPUT, to connect an event to that fd/buffer and use
> splice() on that fd.
> It could reuse most of the perf buffer code, but simply not map it into
> userspace and therefore not have the restriction on the vaddr.
> Once you have that, a .splice_read implementation shouldn't be too hard.

Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-12 19:09    [W:0.080 / U:0.532 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site