[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets
On 05/12/2010 04:20 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 16:13 +0200, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>> What you are saying is that an application
>> programmer who wants to just use memory cgroups should also care about
>> cpusets and just about countless other cgroup subsystems that can
>> exist.
> That's exactly what he says if he mounts them together.

No, the programmer does not mount anything. Programmer writes
application which wants to create a subgroup. System admin is the one
who decides what is mounted how. And the programmer (=me) needs a way
how to reliably create a subgroup, without knowing details about all
controllers. E.g. 'blkio' controller is quite new one, old applications
do now know anything about it, yet according to your idea, the
application *must* provide sane defaults to it.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-12 16:43    [W:0.102 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site