lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [trivial PATCH] arch/x86: Remove unnecessary returns from void function()'s
From
Date
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 20:58 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 08:51 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 20:37 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> Churn is *not* motivated just
> >> for "consistency" unless it improves readability.
> > Consistency improves readability.
> As a general rule, sure.
> For any specific instance it is a big "it
> depends".

In these specific instances, in my opinion it does.
Your assertion is simply your opinion.
In the end, neither opinion matters much.

cheers, Joe



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-12 09:53    [W:0.038 / U:34.312 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site