Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [trivial PATCH] arch/x86: Remove unnecessary returns from void function()'s | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Tue, 11 May 2010 21:37:44 -0700 |
| |
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 20:58 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 05/11/2010 08:51 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 20:37 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> Churn is *not* motivated just > >> for "consistency" unless it improves readability. > > Consistency improves readability. > As a general rule, sure. > For any specific instance it is a big "it > depends".
In these specific instances, in my opinion it does. Your assertion is simply your opinion. In the end, neither opinion matters much.
cheers, Joe
| |