[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6)
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:36:33AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> OK, so can the suspend blocker then become just:
> # Block suspend while idle, system stays running
> # echo default > /sys/power/policy
> and the when it's OK to suspend:
> # Allow suspend while idle, system suspends when it hits kernel idle loop
> # echo opportunistic > /sys/power/policy
> or do you still need something more to ensure the data gets into your
> app and be handled?

Yes. You still need suspend blocks.

> The part I really don't like is the idea of patching all over the drivers
> and userspace for the wakelocks/suspendblocks.

I don't like the idea either, but given that nobody has actually
provided any other ideas that would actually work then I don't think
we've got a great deal of choice.

Matthew Garrett |

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-12 10:08    [W:0.253 / U:31.272 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site