[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] scripts/ default to not include unspecified tags
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:36:36AM +0200, wrote:
> This changes the default of the option --git-all-signature-types to be
> disabled by default.
> The effect being, that only certain (currently Signed-Off-By:,
> Acked-By: and Reviewed-By:) tags are used to get adresses of potential
> maintainers.
> Motivated is this change by the desire to not 'spam' people unnecessary:
> A Tested-By or a Reported-By is not ment as a hint that those people
> want to/are able to review patches to the code in question.
> In a quest to find resilient statistics for this i came up with this:
> I produced a list of all the tag-signers not already covered
> with a signed-off/acked/reviewed tag somewhere in the last year of git history.
> Those were 650 addresses of "assumed non-developers".
> And to check if those "assumed non-developers" are professional
> testers/reporters worth cc'ing, i then counted their total appearences
> in the git log:
> 469 were mentioned only once.
> 123 were mentioned twice.
> 38 three times
> 8 four times
> 5 six times
> 5 five times
> 1 eight times
> 1 fourteen times
> I believe this supports my thesis, that the ''non-maintainer-tags'' are
> not actively useful for patch-review. (except probably the guy
> mentioned fourteen times...)
> But of course one could also find arguments to poke holes in this
> statistics, for example does this statistic not include code-locality:
> A tested-by on a patch that touches some specific piece of
> code can be more worth than a signed-off in another part of the tree.
> But... let's play it safe and let's err on the "safe" side
> meaning to not spam those people when in doubt. We already have the
> signed-off's and Maintainers file. So this should be ok. And if need be,
> the maintainers can always forward the patch.
> [i probably could make a diploma thesis out of this changelog :)]


> Signed-off-by: Florian Mickler <>

I second this reasoning:

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <>

Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | |
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-12 11:27    [W:0.095 / U:1.868 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site