Messages in this thread | | | From | Oliver Neukum <> | Subject | Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems | Date | Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:09:11 +0200 |
| |
Am Mittwoch, 7. April 2010 17:35:51 schrieb Daniel Mack: > > Alan, any objection to just using usb_buffer_alloc() for every driver? > > Or is that too much overhead? > > FWIW, most drivers I've seen in the past hours use a wild mix of > kmalloc(), kzalloc(), kcalloc() and usb_buffer_alloc(). That should > really be unified.
kmalloc() & friends != usb_buffer_alloc(). They do different things. It makes no sense to unify them. If you really need an ordinary buffer DMA will surely work on, this needs a third primitive.
Regards Oliver
| |