[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Le jeudi 08 avril 2010 à 00:05 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <>
> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:00:19 +0200
> > If run individually, the tests results are more what we would expect
> > (slow), but if machine runs the two set of process concurrently, each
> > group runs much faster...
> BTW, I just discovered (thanks to the function graph tracer, woo hoo!)
> that loopback TCP packets get fully checksum validated on receive.
> I'm trying to figure out why skb->ip_summed ends up being
> CHECKSUM_NONE in tcp_v4_rcv() even though it gets set to
> CHECKSUM_PARTIAL in tcp_sendmsg().
> I wonder how much this accounts for some of the hackbench
> oddities... and other regressions in loopback tests we've seen.
> :-)
> Just FYI...

Thanks !

But hackbench is a af_unix benchmark, so loopback stuff is not used that
much :)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-08 09:29    [W:0.095 / U:5.992 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site