[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] rcu: add rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protect
Le mercredi 07 avril 2010 à 17:19 +0100, David Howells a écrit :

> what is the value of sk->sk_wmem_alloc to the lock context of sk->sk_filter?
> Why would lockdep be interested in sk_wmem_alloc?
> Surely, the assertion that the value of sk->sk_filter is related to
> sk_wmem_alloc being 0 is independent of the need to dereference sk_filter for
> RCU purposes. So why are these being combined?

Because when sk->sk_filter is eventually written by some thread, this
thread _must_ own a reference on the socket, that is sk_wmem_alloc > 0

So when reading sk->sk_filter, the general condition is :
- We own the rcu lock
- But on the particular case of __sk_free(),
we owned the very last reference to sk (we are going to kfree it), so
nobody can possibly change sk->sk_filter under us.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-07 18:37    [W:0.051 / U:1.516 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site